Interesting People mailing list archives
DPI and my testimony to Congress today
From: David Farber <dave () farber net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:30:06 -0700
Gads I agree with David djf ________________________________________ From: David P. Reed [dpreed () reed com] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 7:31 AM To: David Farber Cc: ip Subject: Re: [IP] Re: DPI and my testimony to Congress today I find the ensuing discussion enlightening. Without mentioning names (you all know who they are) the justification of DPI is that: a) people are fools for not encrypting their traffic. I suppose customers of FedEx are fools for not enclosing their shipped goods in welded shut titanium boxes that will explode if x-rayed. b) I'm good but they are bad. These two themes seem intended to distract from the fact that ISPs are trialing technology explicitly designed to scan all traffic. The arguments of people replying seems to be that bad behavior is *justified* by the ability to do it. I'm tempted to wonder whether they applaud criminals who rob people in dangerous parts of the city. Or people who photograph their neighbors through open windows. ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
Current thread:
- DPI and my testimony to Congress today David Farber (Jul 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DPI and my testimony to Congress today David Farber (Jul 17)
- Re: DPI and my testimony to Congress today David Farber (Jul 18)
- DPI and my testimony to Congress today David Farber (Jul 18)
- DPI and my testimony to Congress today David Farber (Jul 18)
- Re: DPI and my testimony to Congress today David Farber (Jul 18)
- Re: DPI and my testimony to Congress today David Farber (Jul 18)