Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP
From: lurker () ITIS COM (M J)
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 13:41:15 -0000
There was a discussion about "blacklisting" back in mid May if I remember correctly. (I would recommend anyone interested in this should take a look at the archives - there were a lot of posts on this topic) Be careful - sounds like we are dancing on the edge of that thread again. I think this is a good topic that many people have strong opinions about (BTW I agree with you Keith =), I just don't want it to digress like the IP Blacklisting thread did. My two coppers... -Matthew There is an organization started not too long ago called RISP (Respnosible Internet Service Providers). Maybe we should start getting them to list "rogue" ISP/providers. As of right now they act as a source of contact information to security professional with certain ISP's. Just a thought =) It would be nice to have a central repository for blacklisted ISP's. Keith
Current thread:
- Re: 85.85.85.85 weirdness, (continued)
- Re: 85.85.85.85 weirdness Jud (Jul 19)
- msnhome.talkcity.com Dirk Koopman (Jul 21)
- Re: msnhome.talkcity.com Ryan Yagatich (Jul 24)
- Anyone ever heard of "rlumkaus" virus/bug/trojan/backdoor? Litscher, Steven (Jul 21)
- Sudden increase in scans. Rune Kristian Viken (Jul 20)
- Re: Sudden increase in scans. Aaron Kelley (Jul 24)
- Wierd Windows 98 bug? Mark Collins (Jul 20)
- Port 38293 Tim H (Jul 21)
- Re: Port 38293 Talisker (Jul 22)
- Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP M J (Jul 10)
- Re: scan log and subsequent response from the host's ISP Pauel Loshkin (Jul 10)