Security Incidents mailing list archives
Re: @home: Is *anyone* really home there???
From: tmolina () HOME COM (Thomas Molina)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 22:38:31 -0600
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Philip R. Moyer wrote:
Jim Littlefield writes:Unless @Home gets lots of complaints regarding a particular user, they do very little, if anything. Spam and open NNTP servers are the only complaints that they appear to act on. I am an @Home customer and was getting repeated entire port range scans from another @Home customer located in the next town. I blasted off a complaint and received nothing in return. A telephone call to @Home and multiple conversations with a number of "supervisors" resulted in very little being done. IMHO, @Home's network is poorly managed and their support is next to useless. Unfortunately for me, DSL is not an option at this time.I find it interesting and discouraging that @home apparently feels free to harbor hackers and other criminals, but will not offer services to security professionals. I guess we just have to mark them down as "bad guys" until they learn to play nice on the Net.
I find it interesting that my experience has been so different than what is being reported here. I've reported a number of @home customers for portscanning and other problematic behaviour. True, I seldom get any feedback other than the automated acknowledgement of my report, but it does happen. I know of two people who had their service turned off because of my report, one directly and one indirectly. The first was a friend who had just gotten his service turned on the previous week and started some questionable activity. When I reported the activity directed against me I hadn't realized who it was; I only found out later. It's obvious there are a lot of clueless people on the @home service. Putting the interface my cable modem is plugged into in promiscuous mode reveals a lot. The one time I did have a chance to call and speak with a technician was the day they started scanning for people who'd set up unauthorized servers. The person I talked with was able to anser my questions and seemed to have a clue. Maybe I got lucky; maybe the service varies depending on who the local provider is.
Current thread:
- Re: smurf scanning, (continued)
- Re: smurf scanning Rick Magill (Feb 23)
- @home: Is *anyone* really home there??? Missouri FreeNet Administration (Feb 22)
- Re: @home: Is *anyone* really home there??? Omachonu Ogali (Feb 22)
- Re: @home: Is *anyone* really home there??? Jim Littlefield (Feb 23)
- Re: @home: Is *anyone* really home there??? James M. Atkinson, Comm-Eng (Feb 23)
- Re: @home: Is *anyone* really home there??? David Brumley (Feb 23)
- Re: @home: Is *anyone* really home there??? Philip R. Moyer (Feb 23)
- Re: @home: Is *anyone* really home there??? Jim Littlefield (Feb 23)
- Re: @home: Is *anyone* really home there??? Brad Griffin (Feb 24)
- Re: @home: Is *anyone* really home there??? Jon Paul, Nollmann (Feb 26)
- Re: @home: Is *anyone* really home there??? Thomas Molina (Feb 24)
- IMAPD probe from 210.242.175.223 (sampa.org.tw) David A. Bandel (Feb 23)