funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] Who is paying for the Iraq War
From: Shyaam <shyaam () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:14:49 -0400
Sorry to respond to this email, "BUT" that is not the conversation that was intended to be started. The Gentleman who responded to my email, just mentioned that it is off the topic and that NO one really knows what is behind which move. So, I would request everyone to stop talking about IRAQ War talk in the Privacy listing. This is not what I intended to start. What I was talking about is about the Government, which is concentrating on many different things and lacking its concentration on certain issues that might become a loophole for the bad ones to enter into the nation. It is about loss of privacy or data theft, and not about Iraq war. Kind Regards, Shyaam On 7/21/07, rms () computerbytesman com <rms () computerbytesman com> wrote:
We got a much better deal in the 1991 Iraq War. The Saudi's paid for about 75% of the costs of the war. Cheney was in charge of the sales job in 1991. He told the Saudi's if you don't stop Saddam in Kuwait, you're next. Richard > On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 02:12:22PM -0500, Brian Loe (knobdy () gmail com) > wrote: >> On 7/21/07, Shyaam <shyaam () gmail com> wrote: >> >> > Instead of conquering other nations and gaining more money in war, >> >> I agree with virtually everything you said, except this statement. Its >> been shown that we have spent more money running up to and invading >> Iraq than we could have ever hoped to get out of the oil Iraq >> possesses. It wasn't a war for oil. > > You conflate two things here that are not even close to the same. The > monetary cost of invading Iraq will be paid for by the taxpayers and > their grandchildren. The profits from the oil will accrue to others. > Under no circumstance will oil profits be applied against the national > debt. > -- > Ken Dyke, > 406.581.0495 > > "Linux can win as long as services/protocols are commodities. By folding > extended functionality into today's commodity services and creating new > protocols, we raise the bar and change the rules of the game." > -- from an internal Microsoft memo > _______________________________________________ > privacy mailing list > privacy () whitestar linuxbox org > http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy > _______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
-- Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Shyaam Sundhar R.S., GREM, GHTQ, GWAS, GPCI
_______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- [privacy] Privacy is dead; Just ask the president Richard M. Smith (Jul 21)
- Re: [privacy] Privacy is dead; Just ask the president Shyaam (Jul 21)
- Re: [privacy] Privacy is dead; Just ask the president Brian Loe (Jul 21)
- Re: [privacy] Privacy is dead; Just ask the president Ken Dyke (Jul 21)
- Re: [privacy] Privacy is dead; Just ask the president Shyaam (Jul 21)
- Re: [privacy] Who is paying for the Iraq War rms (Jul 21)
- Re: [privacy] Who is paying for the Iraq War Shyaam (Jul 21)
- Re: [privacy] Privacy is dead; Just ask the president Brian Loe (Jul 21)
- Re: [privacy] Privacy is dead; Just ask the president Shyaam (Jul 21)
- Re: [privacy] The why of the Iraq War rms (Jul 21)
- Re: [privacy] The why of the Iraq War Gadi Evron (Jul 21)
- Re: [privacy] Privacy is dead; Just ask the president Shyaam (Jul 21)
- Re: [privacy] Privacy is dead; Just ask the president Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 23)