funsec mailing list archives
Re: [privacy] Highway safety
From: Blanchard_Michael () emc com
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:27:59 -0400
Now if they set up the checkpoint in your driveway or even your living room, then I would expect that a violation of rights has occurred. One would think this would long ago been settled in court if otherwise. ---> (I understand the "your property" deal I think you're trying to convey, but why not at the entrance to your street then? or just in front of your house on the public street. Where would my rights NOT be violated? The 4th amendment states that we are protected from unlawful search and seizure, basically the authorities need a reason to search me or to pull me over if I'm driving. Ever try to simply refuse to answer any questions at a DUI checkpoint and just turn around? You'll land in lockup faster than you know what happened. If you manage to turn around, you'll have the blue lights behind you just as fast. If you don't submit, you're presumed guilty trying to hide something.... regardless of "innocent until proven...." If I'm swerving, or driving "funky" pull me over and give me a test if you feel I'm drunk, I have no problem with that.... but DON'T pull everyone over hoping to catch someone whose drunk behind the wheel.... The only type of checkpoint that I would remotely think is needed is when a child gets kidnapped and there's an amber alert.... but even then I'm sure the stops get abused.... Mike B
_______________________________________________ privacy mailing list privacy () whitestar linuxbox org http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy
Current thread:
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety, (continued)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Dmitry Chan (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Brian Loe (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Dennis Henderson (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Brian Loe (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Dennis Henderson (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Drsolly (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Brian Loe (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety David Lodge (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Drsolly (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Dennis Henderson (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Blanchard_Michael (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Blanchard_Michael (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Drsolly (Oct 23)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Drsolly (Oct 23)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Richard M. Smith (Oct 23)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety der Mouse (Oct 23)
- Re: [privacy] Highway safety Brian Loe (Oct 24)
- Re: [privacy] Want a beer at the pub? Have your prints taken Drsolly (Oct 23)
- Re: [privacy] Want a beer at the pub? Have your prints taken Brian Loe (Oct 23)
- Re: [privacy] Want a beer at the pub? Have your prints taken Dude VanWinkle (Oct 23)
- Re: [privacy] Want a beer at the pub? Have your prints taken Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 23)