funsec mailing list archives
Re: Sony to patch copy-protected,
From: "Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah" <rMslade () shaw ca>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 15:14:18 -0800
Date sent: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:29:21 -0800 From: Rob Thompson <my.security.lists () gmail com>
Sad part is the patch that they are pushing out via their website attempts to install itself via ActiveX. As far as I know, doing it that way, doesn't that mean that they are taking away our ability to see what exactly they are doing to our machine when they "patch" it? As there isn't an actual executable that can be taken apart and analyzed?
Hey, if you can't fool a Web server and decompile the ActiveX control, we're going to have to take away your copy of Ida Pro ... ====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer) rslade () vcn bc ca slade () victoria tc ca rslade () sun soci niu edu To define recursion, we must first define recursion. http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev or http://sun.soci.niu.edu/~rslade _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Sony to patch copy-protected, Fergie (Nov 02)
- Re: Sony to patch copy-protected, Rob Thompson (Nov 02)
- Re: Sony to patch copy-protected, Blue Boar (Nov 02)
- Re: Sony to patch copy-protected, Nick FitzGerald (Nov 02)
- Re: Sony to patch copy-protected, Rob Thompson (Nov 02)
- Re: Sony to patch copy-protected, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah (Nov 02)
- Re: Sony to patch copy-protected, Rob Thompson (Nov 02)
- Re[2]: Sony to patch copy-protected, Pierre Vandevenne (Nov 02)
- Message not available
- Re: Re[2]: Sony to patch copy-protected, Dude VanWinkle (Nov 02)
- Re: Re[2]: Sony to patch copy-protected, Nick FitzGerald (Nov 02)
- Re[4]: Sony to patch copy-protected, Pierre Vandevenne (Nov 03)
- Re: Sony to patch copy-protected, Rob Thompson (Nov 02)