funsec mailing list archives
Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:27:26 -0400
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:08:38 CDT, Paul Schmehl said:
You mean *used to*. Nessus isn't free any more. I'll rummage around on the Purdue site. But you should know that tools aren't the only problem. Time is too. There's only two of us doing this work, and va isn't our only responsibility. How many bodies do you have in security?
Umm.. let's see. There's our IT Sec Officer, and then there's Randy, and then there's a bunch of people on our CIRT who aren't officially "security", but who have some security-related responsibility related to their day-to-day job. Randy calls it the "volunteer rescue squad model". Somewhere between a half dozen to a dozen. And then of course, we have all the departments who have their own pet sysadmins, who are usually responsible for making sure the machines they admin are secure. One thing we usually try really hard to leverage are the departmental admins. Shameless plug: Hosting a SANS-EDU is a good way to get a lot of training for your admins, cheap. :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology?, (continued)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Blue Boar (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Blue Boar (Oct 12)
- Message not available
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 13)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Robert Edmonds (Oct 20)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 20)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Eduardo Tongson (Oct 20)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 11)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 12)
- RE: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Aditya Deshmukh (Oct 11)
- RE: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 12)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 12)
- RE: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Aditya Deshmukh (Oct 12)
- RE: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Barrie Dempster (Oct 13)
- Re: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Roland Dobbins (Oct 13)
- RE: so, is I[dp]S a STUPID technology? Paul Schmehl (Oct 13)