RE: Re: Malware sharing? People are full of shit [was: Getyour computer viruses here!]

["Randy Abrams" <abrams () eset com>]

I don't think that muddies anything. We have seen lots and lots of script
kiddy attacks from publicly posted crap, and we have seen the talented bad
guys create their own stuff without reusing code. If a bad guy has a target
he's going to make sure he uses something they won't detect. 

The bad guys are already using the alternatives. 

Cheers,

Randy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: funsec-bounces () linuxbox org 
> [mailto:funsec-bounces () linuxbox org] On Behalf Of Blue Boar
> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:23 PM
> To: Drsolly
> Cc: funsec () linuxbox org
> Subject: Re: [funsec] Re: Malware sharing? People are full of 
> shit [was: Getyour computer viruses here!]
>
> Drsolly wrote:
> > > Then let us agree most Bad Guys won't bother with it as they have 
> > > better surces?
> > I don't agree. What are these sources?
>
> I would like to further muddy things by pointing out that I 
> would much rather the bad guys go ahead and use public, known 
> malware rather than the alternatives.
>
>                                               BB
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1343 (20051228) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.