Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)

[Dan Tulovsky <dant () wetsnow com>]

http://www.secdev.org/projects/scapy/build_your_own_tools.html

Seems to be what you want.

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Darren Martyn
<d.martyn.fulldisclosure () gmail com> wrote:
> Off topic (kinda) but with all this talk on SCAPY, has anyone a good
> reference on using it IN a python script for crafting/reading packets? Me
> and a friend wanted to write a python version of Ettercap/dsniff using the
> SCAPY libraries as a challenge and as a learning experience. Even if we can
> just get some reliable ARP poisoning to work with it we will be pretty
> happy, and will have learned something. Any good literature?
>
> Also, ON topic -
> http://packetstormsecurity.org/files/106873/winnuke2011.sh.txt
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Mario Vilas <mvilas () gmail com> wrote:
> > I've used Impacket to craft raw packets of all kinds. Then again I don't
> > know if that counts - used to work at Core at the time, so it was pretty
> > much the only choice due to licensing issues with other libraries.
> > I don't mean to say it's a bad tool to work with, not at all. I happen to
> > prefer the newer Scapy, but it's just a matter of personal taste. :)
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Antony widmal <antony.widmal () gmail com>
> > wrote:
> > > Dear Dan,
> > > Impacket was at first a Pysmb copy/update from Core Security in order to
> > > play with RPC. (look at the source)
> > > They've done some work on pysmb library in order to implement DCE/RPC
> > > functionality in this dinosaurus lib.
> > > Saying that we should use Impacket in order to craft *raw* UDP packet
> > > is definitively the dumbest thing I've heard today. Seriously. Anyone can
> > > confirm that ? Mario ? Carlos ? ....
> > > Anyways, This guy doesn't understand shit, talks a lot about shit he
> > > doesn't know about, why would you even spend time reading his shit ?
> > > This vulnerability is about sending a *huge fucking* stream of UDP
> > > packets on a closed port in order to trigger a int overflow via a ref count.
> > > Most of the people here didn't even understand what we are talking
> > > about/dealing with.
> > > Anyways, it's probably time for you to unsubscribe since you don't follow
> > > and S-K's like secn3t () gmail com are trying to act like they know.
> > > Yeah right, a UDP int overflow triggered via a refcount UDP overflow that
> > > you can trigger with 1 single TCP (with the right ACK) packet is the way to
> > > go.
> > > This mailing list is getting gay, seriously.
> > > Cheers,
> > > Antony.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Dan Ballance <tzewang.dorje () gmail com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Okay, now I'm confused!
> > > > From http://oss.coresecurity.com/projects/impacket.html
> > > > "Impacket is a collection of Python classes focused on providing access
> > > > to network packets. Impacket allows Python developers to craft and decode
> > > > network packets in simple and consistent manner. It includes support for
> > > > low-level protocols such as IP, UDP and TCP, as well as higher-level
> > > > protocols such as NMB and SMB. Impacket is highly effective when used in
> > > > conjunction with a packet capture utility or package such as Pcapy. Packets
> > > > can be constructed from scratch, as well as parsed from raw data.
> > > > Furthermore, the object oriented API makes it simple to work with deep
> > > > protocol hierarchies."
> > > > Thanks for your input Antony. Can you explain why impacket has nothing
> > > > to do with crafting UDP packets?
> > > >
> > > > Fascinating thread this. Thanks to all!!
> > > >
> > > > dan :)
> > > > On 11 November 2011 22:42, Antony widmal <antony.widmal () gmail com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > You are definitely a lamer secn3t.
> > > > > Also for you little brain, impacket has nothing to do with crafting UDP
> > > > > packets..
> > > > > Thanks for proving this again and again.
> > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:36 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t () gmail com> wrote:
> > > > > > well look at that :P
> > > > > > not same author but , nice coding predelka! good one, i will add you
> > > > > > to crazycoders.com coderslist... i guess there is a few codes you have
> > > > > > now done wich might be useful... cheers.
> > > > > > xd
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 12 November 2011 05:43, Ryan Dewhurst <ryandewhurst () gmail com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > An attempt at a possible MS11-083 DoS/PoC exploit, by
> > > > > > > @hackerfantastic:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://pastebin.com/fjZ1k0fi
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Thor (Hammer of God)
> > > > > > > <thor () hammerofgod com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Yeah, I gotta say, I’m going to use it at some point ;)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
> > > > > > > > [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of
> > > > > > > > Mario Vilas
> > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 9:02 AM
> > > > > > > > To: Ryan Dewhurst
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft Windows vulnerability in
> > > > > > > > TCP/IP
> > > > > > > > Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I liked the "heavy breather in the perv closet" bit.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Ryan Dewhurst
> > > > > > > > <ryandewhurst () gmail com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what
> > > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > was thinking at least.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <jon.kertz () gmail com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t () gmail com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit,
> > > > > > > > > > 49days
> > > > > > > > > > to send a packet, my butt.
> > > > > > > > > > There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done
> > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it
> > > > > > > > > > only
> > > > > > > > > > has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and
> > > > > > > > > > trigger
> > > > > > > > > > vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers,
> > > > > > > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > > somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich
> > > > > > > > > > rocks...
> > > > > > > > > > and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the
> > > > > > > > > > src
> > > > > > > > > > so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats
> > > > > > > > > > up to
> > > > > > > > > > you but thats better way to make it work, this will open
> > > > > > > > > > sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the
> > > > > > > > > > goal
> > > > > > > > > > is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so
> > > > > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > > > > iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts
> > > > > > > > > > over 3
> > > > > > > > > > nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered
> > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one
> > > > > > > > > > thing,
> > > > > > > > > > and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another..
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code.
> > > > > > > > > Either
> > > > > > > > > with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know
> > > > > > > > > what's going on, but so far your description has been off base
> > > > > > > > > (from
> > > > > > > > > what I can make of your writing).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or
> > > > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > > are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > > > > > > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > > > > > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > > > > > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > > > > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > “There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights
> > > > > > > > the enemy
> > > > > > > > of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When
> > > > > > > > the military
> > > > > > > > becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the
> > > > > > > > people.”
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > > > > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > > > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > > > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > “There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights
> > the enemy of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When
> > the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the
> > people.”
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
>
> --
> My Homepage :D
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/