Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)


From: Dan Ballance <tzewang.dorje () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 23:10:37 +0000

Okay, now I'm confused! From
http://oss.coresecurity.com/projects/impacket.html

"Impacket is a collection of Python classes focused on providing access to
network packets. Impacket allows Python developers to craft and decode
network packets in simple and consistent manner. It includes support for
low-level protocols such as IP, UDP and TCP, as well as higher-level
protocols such as NMB and SMB. Impacket is highly effective when used in
conjunction with a packet capture utility or package such as
Pcapy<http://oss.coresecurity.com/projects/pcapy.html>.
Packets can be constructed from scratch, as well as parsed from raw data.
Furthermore, the object oriented API makes it simple to work with deep
protocol hierarchies."

Thanks for your input Antony. Can you explain why impacket has nothing to
do with crafting UDP packets?

Fascinating thread this. Thanks to all!!

dan :)

On 11 November 2011 22:42, Antony widmal <antony.widmal () gmail com> wrote:

You are definitely a lamer secn3t.
Also for you little brain, impacket has nothing to do with crafting UDP
packets..

Thanks for proving this again and again.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:36 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t () gmail com> wrote:

well look at that :P
not same author but , nice coding predelka! good one, i will add you
to crazycoders.com coderslist... i guess there is a few codes you have
now done wich might be useful... cheers.
xd



On 12 November 2011 05:43, Ryan Dewhurst <ryandewhurst () gmail com> wrote:
An attempt at a possible MS11-083 DoS/PoC exploit, by @hackerfantastic:

http://pastebin.com/fjZ1k0fi

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Thor (Hammer of God)
<thor () hammerofgod com> wrote:
Yeah, I gotta say, I’m going to use it at some point ;)



From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of Mario
Vilas
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 9:02 AM
To: Ryan Dewhurst

Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft Windows vulnerability in
TCP/IP
Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)



I liked the "heavy breather in the perv closet" bit.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Ryan Dewhurst <ryandewhurst () gmail com

wrote:

I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what I
was thinking at least.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <jon.kertz () gmail com>
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t () gmail com> wrote:
About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit,
49days
to send a packet, my butt.
There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with
seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only
has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger
vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like
somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks...
and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src
so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to
you but thats better way to make it work, this will open
sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the
goal
is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so ,
iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3
nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered
with
ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one
thing,
and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another..

I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either
with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know
what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from
what I can make of your writing).

No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you
are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/



--
“There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights
the enemy
of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When
the military
becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.”

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Current thread: