Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)
From: Dan Ballance <tzewang.dorje () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 23:10:37 +0000
Okay, now I'm confused! From http://oss.coresecurity.com/projects/impacket.html "Impacket is a collection of Python classes focused on providing access to network packets. Impacket allows Python developers to craft and decode network packets in simple and consistent manner. It includes support for low-level protocols such as IP, UDP and TCP, as well as higher-level protocols such as NMB and SMB. Impacket is highly effective when used in conjunction with a packet capture utility or package such as Pcapy<http://oss.coresecurity.com/projects/pcapy.html>. Packets can be constructed from scratch, as well as parsed from raw data. Furthermore, the object oriented API makes it simple to work with deep protocol hierarchies." Thanks for your input Antony. Can you explain why impacket has nothing to do with crafting UDP packets? Fascinating thread this. Thanks to all!! dan :) On 11 November 2011 22:42, Antony widmal <antony.widmal () gmail com> wrote:
You are definitely a lamer secn3t. Also for you little brain, impacket has nothing to do with crafting UDP packets.. Thanks for proving this again and again. On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:36 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t () gmail com> wrote:well look at that :P not same author but , nice coding predelka! good one, i will add you to crazycoders.com coderslist... i guess there is a few codes you have now done wich might be useful... cheers. xd On 12 November 2011 05:43, Ryan Dewhurst <ryandewhurst () gmail com> wrote:An attempt at a possible MS11-083 DoS/PoC exploit, by @hackerfantastic: http://pastebin.com/fjZ1k0fi On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Thor (Hammer of God) <thor () hammerofgod com> wrote:Yeah, I gotta say, I’m going to use it at some point ;) From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of MarioVilasSent: Friday, November 11, 2011 9:02 AM To: Ryan Dewhurst Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft Windows vulnerability inTCP/IPCould Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) I liked the "heavy breather in the perv closet" bit. On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Ryan Dewhurst <ryandewhurst () gmail comwrote: I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what I was thinking at least. On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <jon.kertz () gmail com>wrote:On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <secn3t () gmail com> wrote:About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit,49daysto send a packet, my butt. There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks... and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to you but thats better way to make it work, this will open sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, thegoalis, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so , iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3 nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggeredwithONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is onething,and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another..I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from what I can make of your writing). No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ -- “There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fightsthe enemyof the state, the other serves and protects the people. Whenthe militarybecomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.”_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516), (continued)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Sergito (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) xD 0x41 (Nov 10)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 10)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Jon Kertz (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Ryan Dewhurst (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Mario Vilas (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Thor (Hammer of God) (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Ryan Dewhurst (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) xD 0x41 (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Antony widmal (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Dan Ballance (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Antony widmal (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Jeffrey Walton (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Antony widmal (Nov 11)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Dan Ballance (Nov 13)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Mario Vilas (Nov 12)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Darren Martyn (Nov 12)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) dave bl (Nov 13)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Dan Tulovsky (Nov 13)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Antony widmal (Nov 13)
- Re: Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 11)