Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Standing Up Against German Laws - Project HayNeedle


From: Simon Richter <Simon.Richter () hogyros de>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:45:19 +0100

Hi,

Florian Echtler さんは書きました:

Just to make myself clear: I don't think it is a viable option to create
email noise, I just pointed out that it makes more sense than TCP/HTTP
noise.

There is already enough email noise thanks to spam. It might make sense
to reply to some of it though, to create the illusion of a fully
connected network (i.e. poison the data).

As for using encryption: the fact that communication has happened (with
respect to email, at least) can't be hidden, at least not if one or both
ends of the communication are with a big public email provider.

Well, it might make sense to finally get a standard for email headers
within the easily encryptable data bits, so the outer message headers
would show only communication between some gateway service and the
communications endpoint.

Of course, there is always the option of a P2P darknet. :-)

   Simon

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: