Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??**
From: Steve Kudlak <stevex11 () sbcglobal net>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 21:17:07 -0700
Paul Schmehl wrote:
This is really material for a poli group. The interesting thing is that we indeed seem to have elected a government that many of us don't trust and think is up to no good. I am sorry but this is unsually high. I have haeard too many curious things from too many people who one I would have never heard such things from in the past. Of course there is an election comeing and we can throw some of 'em out of office. Of course some of this sounds like a Sally Churkshank(sp?) Short likePete Simpson wrote:Pete, are you even reading what I wrote? A building the size of the twin towers would fall to the ground in under 10 seconds, per the standard calculations that, as you say, any high school student would know.You have confirmed that the data are correct, you have no way to attack the principles, so where is the logical error? Be very precise.How much more precise do I need to be? Your calculations are incorrect by an order of ten. Instead of 90+ seconds, the answer is 9.0+ - IOW, precisely the same amount of time it took for the buildings to actually fall.Furthermore, you have a logical fallacy in your argument, because you are insisting that a controlled demolition collapse would be faster than an accidental collapse. Which part of the equation tells you that? Objects faill at 32 feet per second per second. The *cause* of the fall is irrelevant.Now, you're obviously wedded to this believe of yours that the government conspired to collapse the buildings. Why is irrelevant. But until you can deal with the facts staring you in the face, there isn't much point in continuing this discussion.BTW, there's no need to cc me on your posts. I can read the list just fine.------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
the her "Charbucks" presentation. which lives here: http://www.funonmars.com/charflash.htmlBut everytime I hear these things thing comes to mind and it is like one is living in a Sally C production Still really I dunno whther this would be better talked out on a poligroup. But the amount of emotion devoted to all of this is interesting. One would not expect
one's freind's child's 4th grade teachers to be into these sorts of things. Have Fun, Sends Steve
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??**, (continued)
- Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??** Paul Schmehl (May 17)
- RE: **LosseChange::Debunk it??** Pete Simpson (May 17)
- Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??** Valdis . Kletnieks (May 17)
- RE: **LosseChange::Debunk it??** Pete Simpson (May 17)
- Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??** Paul Schmehl (May 17)
- Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??** Ducki3 (May 18)
- Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??** c0ntex (May 18)
- Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??** Paul Schmehl (May 18)
- Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??** Ducki3 (May 18)
- Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??** Paul Schmehl (May 17)
- Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??** Paul Schmehl (May 18)
- Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??** Steve Kudlak (May 20)