Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Some one needs their coffee. WAS: blocking Google Desktop
From: "Randall M" <randallm () fidmail com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:20:52 -0600
Hand j.a. a cup or coffee Randall M [-----Original Message----- [From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk [[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf [Of J.A. Terranson [Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 2:10 AM [To: Full-Disclosure [Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] blocking Google Desktop [ [ [ [On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Line Noise wrote: [ [> I'm still trying to help them understand why stuffing a "Chat" [> (mis)feature into gmail is a problem. No way to turn it off, [and each [> account that gets it, starts up with it enabled. Oh, boy, I really [> want the world to know when I'm "on line" (especially when it [> helpfully adds every person who sends you email to your "Contacts" [> list). So far, I've received an email from them, patting me on the [> head, and telling me that I need to read the help menus better. [> "Disable" and "Off" seem not to be in their vocabulary. [ [I just love these /rants! [ [Yes boys and girls, it is not safe to hand your mission [critical data to ANY third party. [ [If your data is sensitive, keep it home. [ [If you don't like Google's email "features", you have a choice [you know. [ [ (Hint: GO SOMEWHERE ELSE!) [ [Yes, it really is THAT EASY to fully protect yourself against [all this Google Evil <lmao!> Just Say No. [ [The town criers who are sounding the alarms are just [ludicrous. My favorites are the folks who are bitching and [moaning, and are performing this parade FROM GMAIL ACCOUNTS! [ [We certainly need FD as to what these products *DO*. [Discussion of how it works is totally appropriate, but the ["evil google doesn't want to give me an off button" bullshit [is pointless. And while it may be entertaining to see how [many "Security Professionals" (insert SANS or other [Pay-For-Play meaningless but very expensive set of initials [here) can't figure out how to simply Say No to a product they [don't like, it's still a horrific waste of bandwidth. Even [worse, it attracts posts like this one - where every asshole [who meets any of the above descriptions will want his or her ["shot" at this post. Have at it - it's all yours for the [taking, I don't give a shit enough to respond, so have a [party. Invite the idiot in the white house, I hear he's [feeling unloved today :-) [ [-- [Yours, [ [J.A. Terranson [sysadmin () mfn org [ ["What The United States *really* needs to win it's War On Some [(but not allied) Terrorists is a good old fashioned Nuclear Enema." [ [_______________________________________________ [Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. [Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html [Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ [ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: blocking Google Desktop, (continued)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop J.A. Terranson (Feb 11)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop Jason Coombs (Feb 11)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop J.A. Terranson (Feb 11)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop Michael Holstein (Feb 13)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop Prabhat Sharma (Feb 13)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop Michael Holstein (Feb 13)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop sekure (Feb 14)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop Michael Holstein (Feb 14)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop sekure (Feb 14)
- RE: Some one needs their coffee. WAS: blocking Google Desktop Randall M (Feb 11)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop gboyce (Feb 11)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop Nick FitzGerald (Feb 11)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop gboyce (Feb 11)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop Michael Holstein (Feb 10)
- Re: blocking Google Desktop Jason Mayer (Feb 10)