Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Nmap Online
From: "Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:49:14 -0500
On 01 Dec 2006 08:33:00 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn () stonehenge com> wrote:
"Dude" == Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle () gmail com> writes:Dude> Here is an example of what is legal vs what isnt: If you scan a Dude> machine with nmap from one machine, that is not illegal. If you run Dude> 100,00 nmap scans from a distributed botnet and take down their Dude> server, thats illegal. It's clear you're not a lawyer, and anyone who takes your advice here would be a fool. But I just wanted to point that out again for the clueless.
so if you are disagreeing with one of the above statements, then one of the following must be true in your opinion: you _can_ legally DoS someones server with 100,000 nmap scans or It is illegal to portscan learn to read buddy. -JP _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Nmap Online, (continued)
- Re: Nmap Online Randal L. Schwartz (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Dude VanWinkle (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Dude VanWinkle (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Randal L. Schwartz (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Dude VanWinkle (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Michael Holstein (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Jason Miller (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Dude VanWinkle (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Randal L. Schwartz (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Dude VanWinkle (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online David Matousek (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online endrazine (Dec 01)
- Re: Nmap Online Ed Carp (Dec 05)
- Re: Nmap Online Greg (Dec 05)
- Re: Nmap Online Richard A Nelson (Dec 05)
- Re: Nmap Online Ed Carp (Dec 05)