Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication
From: n3td3v <n3td3v () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:57:58 +0100
On 4/21/06, John Cartwright <johnc () grok org uk> wrote:
Hi Actually, the list has never been purchased by anyone. Len and I started things off using our own hardware, and when Len retired last year I solicited offers for hosting and support. Of the ~100 or so offers I received, Secunia made the most sense from a financial and technical point of view. For the record, Secunia staff have no access to the FD server and I continue to run it exclusively in an independant manner under a mutual agreement with Secunia. As far as the 'banner' text goes, I myself added that to reward Secunia for their generous support, for which I am extremely grateful. Cheers - John
Hi, Remove the URL, no one wants it there. Secunia has no respect in the industry and probably never will. There website is an eye sore, as is the Secunia URL on the footer message. How dare you allow FD to be high jacked by such a scene whore website, you never consulted the list of your plans to have FD taken over by professional scene whore cyber crooks. It is as much a comparision as allowing FD to be linked from Zone-H.org Who advised you out of your hundreds of offers to allow Secunia to be associated with the Full-Disclosure list? Perhaps you aren't intelligent enough to be making such decisions for the future of the list. Please pull away from Secunia and remove the URL, and partner up with a company which has respect in the industry, rather than Secunia, who are blackhats, as are Zone-H. Also: I'd like my xploitable_at_gmail account back. Cheers - n3td3v _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- RE: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication, (continued)
- RE: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication fractalg (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Morning Wood (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication n3td3v (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Morning Wood (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication gboyce (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication A . L . M . Buxey (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Mike Owen (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication John Cartwright (Apr 21)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Sean Crawford (Apr 21)
- vote nay to mod n3td3v [was: Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication] Gadi Evron (Apr 21)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication n3td3v (Apr 21)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Anders B Jansson (Apr 21)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication n3td3v (Apr 21)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication A . L . M . Buxey (Apr 22)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication n3td3v (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication A . L . M . Buxey (Apr 22)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Dave "No, not that one" Korn (Apr 22)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Exibar (Apr 22)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Brian Eaton (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Morning Wood (Apr 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Andrew A (Apr 20)