Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication
From: <fractalg () highspeedweb net>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:03:47 +0100
Dude, SHUT THE FUCK UP !!! I think we are all tired of this crap you brought to the list. Yes, I know that replying isn't the best idea, but this is really getting annoying... Now, SHUT THE FUCK UP, pretty please ??? -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of n3td3v Sent: quinta-feira, 20 de Abril de 2006 19:17 To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Subject: [Full-disclosure] Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication ------------------------------------------------------------------------ For legal reasons this is not a Secunia advisory. Any republication of this advisory to the Secunia website or to attach the Secunia URL to the bottom of my advisory via the Full-Disclosure mailing list is bad pratice. I'm now investigating all the advisories on the Secunia website which have been stolen as intellectual property, reworded without prior consent of the authors. n3td3v will be in touch to list all the advisories believed to be in violation of copyright law and will be contacting the original owners of advisories to make them away Secunia are liable. As for the footer message, it fails to say its not affiliated with advisories. When you subscribe at grok.org.uk, you are not made aware that Secunia is affiliated with the mailing list and fails to warn users that a Secunia URL will be placed at the bottom of a user or company disclosure. To use the argument that "You knew when Subscribing to FD that Secunia would attach their URL to the bottom of my advisory" is flawed, And I am still investigating weather to say anything post to Full-Disclosure is straight away intellectual property of Secunia, giving them supposed legal right to republish any advisory on the list in any way they see fit. However, because no prior warning of this at grok.org.uk is given, then there must be an illegal loophole somewhere, which I am still researching. Findings will be published as they become apparent. (c)2006 n3td3v _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication n3td3v (Apr 20)
- RE: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication fractalg (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Morning Wood (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication n3td3v (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Morning Wood (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication gboyce (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication A . L . M . Buxey (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Mike Owen (Apr 20)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication John Cartwright (Apr 21)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication Sean Crawford (Apr 21)
- vote nay to mod n3td3v [was: Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication] Gadi Evron (Apr 21)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication n3td3v (Apr 21)
- Re: Secunia illegal spam and advisory republication n3td3v (Apr 20)