Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Reverse dns


From: Andriy Bilous <Andriy.Bilous () sabre com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:37:42 +0100


RFC1123 Section 6, especially 6.1.5

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Schmehl [mailto:pauls () utdallas edu]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 8:14 PM
To: Dale Babiy; full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Reverse dns


--On Thursday, March 10, 2005 11:35:10 AM -0500 Dale Babiy 
<DaleB () BETWWTS com> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rfc1912 section 2.1 says:

   "Every Internet-reachable host should have a name.  The
consequences
   of this are becoming more and more obvious.  Many services
available
   on the Internet will not talk to you if you aren't correctly
   registered in the DNS.

   Make sure your PTR and A records match.  For every IP address,
there
   should be a matching PTR record in the in-addr.arpa domain.

This pretty much settles it for me.  I think I win this argument.

Thanks for all the help from everyone that posted useful responses.

Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/


Current thread: