Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Reverse dns
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:11:54 -0500
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:57:57 CST, Paul Schmehl said:
I've been looking through the RFCs and I can't find it. Some folks think reverse dns should be completely disabled. I know for sure that this will break email, because many mail servers won't talk to a server that doesn't reverse. Tcpdump also doesn't like hosts that won't reverse.
"tcpdump -n" is your friend. :) There's no RFC requirement that there be a valid PTR record. Also, note that there's *lots* of games that can be played with PTR records if they happen to be out of a in-addr.arpa zone controlled by the attacker.....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Reverse dns, (continued)
- Re: Reverse dns Danny (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns (whether you want it or not) TheGesus (Mar 10)
- RE: Re: Reverse dns (whether you want it or not) Edward Ray (Mar 11)
- Re: Reverse dns (whether you want it or not) Dave Korn (Mar 11)
- Re: Re: Reverse dns (whether you want it or not) Danny (Mar 11)
- Re: Reverse dns Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 11)
- Re: Reverse dns Simon Biles (Mar 11)
- Re: Reverse dns Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)
- Re: Reverse dns Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 11)
- RE: Reverse dns Paul Schmehl (Mar 10)