Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Response to comments on Security and Obscurity
From: James Tucker <jftucker () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 22:42:27 +0100
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:53:20 -0700 (PDT), Security List <secfocuslist () yahoo com> wrote:
Mr. Tucker wrote:Maybe, but you have to educate people somehow, andyou don't have timeto explain everything.This is an excuse and the weak point. If you do not have time, and the audience does not care enough to spend the time, then the battle is already lost.
I apologise, but I have spent most of my life at this and I don't know everything, I doubt my audience would donate that much time, even if I gave it. But thank you for your encouragement. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Security & Obscurity: physical-world analogies, (continued)
- Re: Security & Obscurity: physical-world analogies Frank Knobbe (Sep 02)
- Re: Re: Security & Obscurity: physical-world analogies James Tucker (Sep 02)
- Re: Re: Security & Obscurity: physical-world analogies Frank Knobbe (Sep 02)
- Re: Re: Re: Security & Obscurity: physical-world analogies James Tucker (Sep 02)
- Re: Security & Obscurity: physical-world analogies gadgeteer (Sep 03)
- Re: Re: Security & Obscurity: physical-world analogies Tig (Sep 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Re: Security & Obscurity: physical-world analogies gadgeteer (Sep 03)
- Re: Re: Security & Obscurity: physical-world analogies ASB (Sep 05)
- Re: Response to comments on Security and Obscurity James Tucker (Sep 02)
- Re: Response to comments on Security and Obscurity Über GuidoZ (Sep 03)