Re: Sasser author

[Jeremiah Cornelius <jeremiah () nur net>]

On Thursday 13 May 2004 07:59, Serge van Ginderachter (svgn) wrote:
> > I agree...to a point.
> >
> > Sasser violates poorly designed/implemented network
> > infrastructures.
>
> Correct, but that does not make it less a crime.
>
> If I forget to lock my car, it does not make it right to steal it. I'm
> stupid, yes, and my insurance won't pay me back, but it still is a crime.

Yes, but is it a crime that should be equated with holding hostages or 
hijacking airliners?

There is a bogus category of "electronic terrorism", which is being subject to 
the same aggressive prosecutorial standard that is established for those who 
perpetrate real crimes of terror.  18 year-old kids, without /intention/ of 
political or ideological violence against innocents, are being held with the 
legal gravity of weapons smugglers.  Intention is a key definition of guilt 
in - at least - British, and US-ian law.

Here you have a social naive, without any experience in life that connects the 
gravity of consequences to his actions.  Chances are, his life will be pretty 
much ruined.  That is an equitable outcome, because some Systems 
Administrators were given a couple of rough days at work?

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html