Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Wireless ISPs
From: Jeff Workman <jworkman () pimpworks org>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:14:13 -0400
--On Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:26 PM -0700 "Schmidt, Michael R." <Michael.Schmidt () T-Mobile com> wrote:
In some states it is illegal to intercept any communication without both parties knowledge. This is true of wired or wireless communications. Be it a chat session or an online order process. In the state of Washington (my home state) intercepting this communication could be a felony. So at least we have that
AFAIK using credit card information fraudulently is a felony regardless of the legality of the method used to obtain such information. Since credit card fraud is illegal and it still doesn't discourage some people from practicing it, why would making the means of obtaining it illegal discourage it? Sure it adds one more charge on the prospective felon's rap sheet if/when they do get caught, but do they really care? I think not.
-J -- Jeff Workman | http://www.pimpworks.org/nigritude-ultramarine.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Wireless ISPs, (continued)
- Re: Wireless ISPs D B (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Scott Taylor (May 11)
- RE: Wireless ISPs Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh] (May 12)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Valdis . Kletnieks (May 12)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Scott Taylor (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Konstantin Gavrilenko (May 11)
- RE: Wireless ISPs amilabs (May 11)
- RE: Wireless ISPs Michael Gargiullo (May 11)
- RE: Wireless ISPs Byron Copeland (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs D B (May 11)
- RE: Wireless ISPs Julian Ho (May 11)
- RE: Wireless ISPs Jeff Workman (May 11)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Mister Coffee (May 12)
- Re: Wireless ISPs D B (May 12)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Scott Manley (May 12)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Bruno Wolff III (May 13)
- Re: Wireless ISPs Valdis . Kletnieks (May 12)