Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?
From: "Full-Disclosure" <fd () weevers net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:17:08 +0100
"Geo." <geoincidents () getinfo org> wrote:... Even the stupid check tools assume you have the thingon the netbefore it's patched.Yep, yet there are still MS apologists who refuse to open their eyes so as to understand that "Microsoft still shows little hint that it 'gets' security". Regards, Nick FitzGerald
In an corporate environment, you will have SUS or SMS running. If so, no need for internet access. If you don't have this, just place a firewall on the box, or before the box. How hard can this be ? You do it the same way, as you would do before you would patch debian/*bsd/gentoo/ect/ect/ect. There is no real problem here. Don't blame microsoft if you can't come up with solutions to simple security "problems". Niek _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?, (continued)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? John . Airey (Mar 17)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Jos Osborne (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Jeremiah Cornelius (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 17)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Geo. (Mar 17)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Nick FitzGerald (Mar 17)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? John . Airey (Mar 17)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Geo. (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Random Letters (Mar 17)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Full-Disclosure (Mar 18)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Jo Doe (Mar 18)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Random Letters (Mar 18)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? John . Airey (Mar 18)
- Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) madsaxon (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) madsaxon (Mar 18)
- Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia Jason (Mar 18)
- Re: Re: Administrivia Frank Knobbe (Mar 18)