Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?
From: "Random Letters" <randomisedletters () hotmail com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:12:58 +0000
Who are these people who install 'desktop trinkets' and X window managers? You sound as though you're speaking from direct experience.
Give us some examples of desktop trinkets installed on webservers. You sound a bit too smug to me. ---------------------------------------------------------- If you're happy and you know it clap your hands ---------------------------------------------------------- Does HoTMaiL come with a spell checker?
> That's an admin/installer issue, tooo many folks on too many OS'es tend > to install the kitchen sink on systems that don't need all the toys > trinkets and tools that a desktop developer might need in specific > circumstances. > > While redhat has become the linux version of M$ in all the neato > desktop trinkets it has available, the admin doing the install needs to > have enough whits about them to know how to trim the fat and lock the > box for the purpose it is being comisioned for. Too many web servers > exposed to the public have too many desktop trinkets and X window > managers that are not required for the purpose at hand. Look: I am in perfect agreement with you, we are *not* saying anything different ! The same savvy admin I mentioned is the one that would harden (and keep the installed software to a minimum) not only BSD, but also Linux, and Windows too ! But not ALL admins/installers are like that. Unfortunately I have to say that most of them have no clue, and rely too often on default configurations.... which in turns creates new easy targets.... It definitely is an installer/admin issue. But on any OS :) I *definitely* prefer the approach where you don't have anything and you build the system from the ground up (debian, gentoo, BSD for example). But the same clueless installer who will leave the dafault bells and whistles on redhat and on windows..... is the one who could not evenINSTALL BSD in the first place.... so here we are again....It's a vicious circle....
17:12 _________________________________________________________________It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?, (continued)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Stuart Fox (DSL AK) (Mar 16)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? John . Airey (Mar 17)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Jos Osborne (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Jeremiah Cornelius (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 17)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Geo. (Mar 17)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Nick FitzGerald (Mar 17)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? John . Airey (Mar 17)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Geo. (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Random Letters (Mar 17)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Full-Disclosure (Mar 18)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Jo Doe (Mar 18)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Random Letters (Mar 18)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? John . Airey (Mar 18)
- Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) madsaxon (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) madsaxon (Mar 18)
- Administrivia (was: RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? ) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 18)
- Re: Administrivia Jason (Mar 18)