Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February
From: "Ng, Kenneth (US)" <kenng () kpmg com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:50:45 -0500
I'd like to know how low the bit rate had to be to lock onto a signal that low. :-) You can do incredible correlation tricks if you don't mind waiting a long time for the data. In California they use GPS to measure millimeter movements of the fault lines, but they signal correlate for hours, if not days to get the phase differentials. Conversely, this list needs a larger bit rate to get information out to people in a timely fashion. -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com]On Behalf Of Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 11:10 AM To: Epic Cc: 'flatline'; 'Gregory A. Gilliss'; full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Signal to Noise Ratio for February On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:56:09 MST, Epic <epic () hack3r com> said:
Lately the SNR wouldn't allow for minimal communications if this were any communications infrastructure.
You'd be amazed what Shannon lets you get away with. http://seti.sentry.net/archive/bioastro/2000/0147.html -178dBm. Yowza. Need a really big-ass dish to find that signal. ;) ***************************************************************************** The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. ***************************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Signal to Noise Ratio for February Gregory A. Gilliss (Mar 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February flatline (Mar 24)
- RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Epic (Mar 24)
- Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)
- RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Epic (Mar 24)
- RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Ng, Kenneth (US) (Mar 25)
- Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)