Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February
From: "Epic" <epic () hack3r com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:56:09 -0700
Lately the SNR wouldn't allow for minimal communications if this were any communications infrastructure. -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of flatline Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 4:45 PM To: Gregory A. Gilliss; full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Signal to Noise Ratio for February Gregory, What makes you think F-D's "signal" would consist solely of advisories? If you've read the list charter (http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html), you should know to not only filter on the word "advisory". Your method of generating a signal:noise relation seems far from correct. / flatline At 11:41 PM 24-03-2004, Gregory A. Gilliss wrote:
List: Just for fun I decided to calculate the S/N ratio of FD. I used the data from February 2004 (the last full month available). Here's my methodology (for those who can do better :-):
[ snip ] _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Signal to Noise Ratio for February Gregory A. Gilliss (Mar 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February flatline (Mar 24)
- RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Epic (Mar 24)
- Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)
- RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Epic (Mar 24)
- RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Ng, Kenneth (US) (Mar 25)
- Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)