Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:09:49 -0500
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:56:09 MST, Epic <epic () hack3r com> said:
Lately the SNR wouldn't allow for minimal communications if this were any communications infrastructure.
You'd be amazed what Shannon lets you get away with. http://seti.sentry.net/archive/bioastro/2000/0147.html -178dBm. Yowza. Need a really big-ass dish to find that signal. ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Signal to Noise Ratio for February Gregory A. Gilliss (Mar 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February flatline (Mar 24)
- RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Epic (Mar 24)
- Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)
- RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Epic (Mar 24)
- RE: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Ng, Kenneth (US) (Mar 25)
- Re: Signal to Noise Ratio for February Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)