Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: PIX vs CheckPoint
From: Cyril Guibourg <plonk-o-matic () teaser fr>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:29:54 +0200
Laurent LEVIER <llevier () argosnet com> writes: Hi L2,
At the NAT level, you have to know Pix is a NATing box and everything it does is based on NAT.
AFAIK, a PIX can operate without NAT. Did I miss something ? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- PIX vs CheckPoint Darkslaker (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint David T Hollis (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint John Kinsella (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Laurent LEVIER (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Cyril Guibourg (Jun 30)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Jaroslaw Sajko (Jun 30)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Laurent LEVIER (Jun 30)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Cyril Guibourg (Jun 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint James Patterson Wicks (Jun 29)
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint Eric Paynter (Jun 29)
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint Gary E. Miller (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint John Kinsella (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Eric Paynter (Jun 29)
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint Tom Curry (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Gary E. Miller (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Eric Paynter (Jun 29)
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint Eric Paynter (Jun 29)