Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: PIX vs CheckPoint
From: John Kinsella <jlk () thrashyour com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:34:53 -0700
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 01:46:30PM -0700, Eric Paynter wrote:
On Tue, June 29, 2004 11:59 am, James Patterson Wicks said:CheckPoint's interface is very intuitive and easy to use.Easy to use in a "Microsoft" kind of way. Last I heard, it does nice things for you like always allow DNS traffic through, even if you have no port 53 rule and a deny all policy. How helpful!
Sounds like somebody needs to learn how to run FW-1. There's several "implied" rules which are set from Global Properties, and are only displayed/logged if you specity to display/log implied rules. John _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- PIX vs CheckPoint Darkslaker (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint David T Hollis (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint John Kinsella (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Laurent LEVIER (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Cyril Guibourg (Jun 30)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Jaroslaw Sajko (Jun 30)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Laurent LEVIER (Jun 30)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Cyril Guibourg (Jun 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint James Patterson Wicks (Jun 29)
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint Eric Paynter (Jun 29)
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint Gary E. Miller (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint John Kinsella (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Eric Paynter (Jun 29)
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint Tom Curry (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Gary E. Miller (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Eric Paynter (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Jeff Kell (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Matt Ostiguy (Jun 29)
- Re: PIX vs CheckPoint Simon Burr (Jun 29)
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint Eric Paynter (Jun 29)
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is far superior Edward W. Ray (Jun 29)
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint; IMHO Netscreen is far superior Gary E. Miller (Jun 29)