Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: PIX vs CheckPoint


From: "James Patterson Wicks" <pwicks () oxygen com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:59:22 -0400

Three letters . . . 

PDM

The Pix Device Manager is painful to work with.  CheckPoint's interface is very intuitive and easy to use. 


-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of 
Darkslaker
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 2:24 PM
To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: [Full-disclosure] PIX vs CheckPoint

i am studying for the CCSA and my Friend for CSPFA in the interchange of
ideas we did not find differences significant; maybe two ; PIX run in OS
for CISCO and CheckPoint in many platforms;  and checkPoit have more
products.

My question is PIX or Checkpoint what is better and why.



"Yo nací para atrapar dragones en sus guaridas y para recoger flores. Yo
nací para pasar las mañanas contando historias divertidas, para soñar a la
deriva como si fuera yo un arroyo y para caminar descalzo a la luz del sol"

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html



This e-mail is the property of Oxygen Media, LLC.  It is intended only for the person or entity to which it is 
addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. 
Distribution or copying of this e-mail or the information contained herein by anyone other than the intended recipient 
is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by sending an e-mail to 
postmaster () oxygen com and destroy all electronic and paper copies of this e-mail.


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: