Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: M$ - so what should they do?
From: Michael Schaefer <mbs () mistrealm com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:49:30 -0400
Well, lets see, moving away from the Registry (single point of failure) would be a good step.
Separating the operating system from programs would be great, I don't like the fact that everything and it's brother thinks it can or should dump files into the system directory.
What else is flawed? What other changes should be made? William Warren wrote:
redeisgn their products..the basic windows design is flawed and needs reworking for one thing..:)Michael Schaefer wrote:What would you suggest Microsoft do to improve ?
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- M$ Getting Better? Robert Guess (Jun 18)
- RE: M$ Getting Better? joe (Jun 18)
- Re: M$ Getting Better? Michael Gale (Jun 20)
- Re: M$ Getting Better? Nasir Ghaznavi (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ Getting Better? Georgi Guninski (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Michael Schaefer (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? William Warren (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? joe (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Ondrej Krajicek (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Michael Schaefer (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Dave D. Cawley (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Ondrej Krajicek (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? fd (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? joe (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Bruce Ediger (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? KF (lists) (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? joe (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Bruce Ediger (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 22)
- Re: M$ Getting Better? Michael Gale (Jun 20)
- RE: M$ Getting Better? joe (Jun 18)