Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: M$ - so what should they do?
From: "joe" <mvp () joeware net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:29:00 -0400
Anything specific? Obviously this isn't going to happen in the short term and even long term your statement doesn't say the specific issue you feel is in the "basic windows design" that you think is wrong? Is it virtualization of memory? Support of GUI interfaces? What? At the very least what is the top hitter you think needs to be addressed in technical specifics not something like IE sucks and which btw, isn't a basic windows design piece. When I think basic windows design I think core pieces, api level and lower, not interfaces that makes your britches itch. I ask this because there are a lot of people who go around complaining that Windows Sucks and that it is obvious why yet can't state one solid concrete thing let alone a solid concrete basic core Windows thing and how they think it should be redone. I am not saying there aren't things that do suck and I have been very vocal myself with MS concerning these things especially with Exchange and if you go back a few years to code red days you will find usenet posts from me blistering MS over the "on by default" paradigm they followed for so long. Yes they have issues, but what do you think they are that is so flawed in the basic design that takes a complete redesign. joe -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of William Warren Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 11:05 AM To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] M$ - so what should they do? redeisgn their products..the basic windows design is flawed and needs reworking for one thing..:) Michael Schaefer wrote:
What would you suggest Microsoft do to improve ? Georgi Guninski wrote:i am replying to the whole m$ thread, nothing personal. m$ are so bad, so it is really difficult for them to get any worse, but this does not mean they are really getting better. they crossed the badness point of no return() long time ago. georgi _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
-- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape" _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- M$ Getting Better? Robert Guess (Jun 18)
- RE: M$ Getting Better? joe (Jun 18)
- Re: M$ Getting Better? Michael Gale (Jun 20)
- Re: M$ Getting Better? Nasir Ghaznavi (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ Getting Better? Georgi Guninski (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Michael Schaefer (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? William Warren (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? joe (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Ondrej Krajicek (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Michael Schaefer (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Dave D. Cawley (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Ondrej Krajicek (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? fd (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? joe (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Bruce Ediger (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? KF (lists) (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? joe (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ Getting Better? Michael Gale (Jun 20)
- RE: M$ Getting Better? joe (Jun 18)