Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: M$ - so what should they do?
From: Michael Schaefer <mbs () mistrealm com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:52:09 -0400
What would you suggest Microsoft do to improve ? Georgi Guninski wrote:
i am replying to the whole m$ thread, nothing personal. m$ are so bad, so it is really difficult for them to get any worse, but this does not mean they are really getting better. they crossed the badness point of no return() long time ago. georgi _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- M$ Getting Better? Robert Guess (Jun 18)
- RE: M$ Getting Better? joe (Jun 18)
- Re: M$ Getting Better? Michael Gale (Jun 20)
- Re: M$ Getting Better? Nasir Ghaznavi (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ Getting Better? Georgi Guninski (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Michael Schaefer (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? William Warren (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? joe (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Ondrej Krajicek (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Michael Schaefer (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? Dave D. Cawley (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Ondrej Krajicek (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? fd (Jun 21)
- RE: M$ - so what should they do? joe (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? Bruce Ediger (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ - so what should they do? KF (lists) (Jun 21)
- Re: M$ Getting Better? Michael Gale (Jun 20)
- RE: M$ Getting Better? joe (Jun 18)