Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [inbox] Re: Anti-MS drivel
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 18:47:19 -0500
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 18:20:54 EST, joe <mvp () joeware net> said:
imply are common place for you. Not one restore from backup ever. Our AD has
failures and the directory stops replicating to protect itself. We fix the disk subsystem failure, reload the machine, repromote, and it is up and
Am I missing something here regarding the difference between a restore and a reload?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Anti-MS drivel James Patterson Wicks (Jan 17)
- RE: Anti-MS drivel Scott Taylor (Jan 17)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel yossarian (Jan 17)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Anti-MS drivel Curt Purdy (Jan 18)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Anti-MS drivel joe (Jan 18)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Anti-MS drivel joe (Jan 18)
- Re: [inbox] Re: Anti-MS drivel Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 18)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel yossarian (Jan 17)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Ron DuFresne (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Michal Zalewski (Jan 20)
- RE: Old school applications on the Internet (was Anti-MS drivel) Bill Royds (Jan 20)
- Re: Old school applications on the Internet(was Anti-MS drivel) Gregh (Jan 21)
- RE: Old school applications on the Internet(was Anti-MS drivel) Steve Wray (Jan 21)
- Re: Old school applications on the Internet(was Anti-MS drivel) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 22)
- RE: Old school applications on the Internet(was Anti-MS drivel) Bill Royds (Jan 23)
- RE: Anti-MS drivel Scott Taylor (Jan 17)
- Re: Old school applications on the Internet (was Anti-MS drivel) Nico Golde (Jan 22)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel yossarian (Jan 20)