Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak


From: Cael Abal <lists2 () onryou com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:20:14 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

| This may be true where WIN OS based box is deployed in a
| commercial environment. However, I think their EULA is trumped
| by the new US Federal Regulations (HIPAA, DHS, CFR, etc)...

This definitely should be the case, but we'll see.

Personally, I'm amazed that EULAs / click-through licences have any
force of law whatsoever.

It's off-topic for the list, but here's a well-written article on EULAs
by Jim Rapoza. His paper hits on most of the major points and serves as
a good fairly primer for Aunt Betty.

http://www.eweek.com/print_article/0,3048,a=111018,00.asp

C

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFALT+OR2vQ2HfQHfsRAo8jAJ9wafjYzhnjKprBhUm34onUT6E/0wCfYEmc
Waxg5ARDXjx+6mj6tJgdZzA=
=3J8s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: