Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak
From: "Edward W. Ray" <support () mmicman com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:32:52 -0800
"Does it not appear that the leak could have been done to ensure that M$ has a legal argument to abate liability in case they are sued?" I think their EULA which you accept when installing covers their ass for just about anything. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Microsoft confirms source code leak Thor Larholm (Feb 12)
- Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak Bernie, CTA (Feb 13)
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Edward W. Ray (Feb 13)
- Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Bernie, CTA (Feb 13)
- Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak Cael Abal (Feb 13)
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Ron DuFresne (Feb 13)
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Roy M. Silvernail (Feb 13)
- Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak Jeremiah Cornelius (Feb 13)
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Edward W. Ray (Feb 13)
- Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak Bernie, CTA (Feb 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Andre Ludwig (Feb 12)
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Byron Copeland (Feb 12)