Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: lame bitching about xpsp2
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 21:10:58 -0400
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:50:10 +0200, devis said:
Do the interface of OpenOffice and MS Office looks THAT different to you
To a programmer who's abstracted stuff to fairly high levels, they look pretty much the same. However...
? Hell no. These secretaries are formed to work on an interface, and changing a few things in that same interface will not as you think,
Ahem. Actually, it WILL bring things to a crawl. If you're steering your usage via "muscle memory" (OK.. third menu from left, 4 items down, then right click - no conscious idea what you're doing), it hurts a *LOT*. You don't believe me - program your system to swap mouse buttons 1-3 randomly each time you logon, or switch the order of the menus around, or change the keyboard mapping from qwerty to something almost-but-not-quite Dvorak (or back to something not-quite-querty) once in a while, and see how long it takes you to get annoyed. That's what upgrades feel like to a user.
bring the business word to a crawl. To the reverse, it will make them more proefficient at computer usage, as any human does become better when having to deal with different interfaces / systems. It will make them curious about the new software, capabilities and changes. It voids the 'One way of thinking' that vendors try to impose.
Has it ever occurred to you that said secretary isn't *paid* to be curious, and has *no interest* in being curious? (Hint - why are they secretaries and not looking to move into the programming staff?) That "new" software that does things differently gets them mad, because they knew *perfectly well* how to get task XYZ done with the *old* system, and the time it takes them to find out how to do XYZ under the *new* system is time that (in their opinion) probably got wasted because if they hadn't been migrated, they'd not have had to re-learn it. (Not to knock the secretaries - although none of the ones I work with are blessed with loads of curiosity, they've bailed me out of a number of messes caused by my doing paperwork "the way it should be" rather than "the way it is". If the senior secretary says "I don't understand why, and I don't *want* to understand what political issue in another department makes it this way, but you have to do it this way", you *do* it that way.. ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: [OT] Re: lame bitching about xpsp2, (continued)
- Re: [OT] Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 Maarten (Aug 19)
- Re: [OT] Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 Barry Fitzgerald (Aug 18)
- Re: [OT] Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 KF_lists (Aug 18)
- Re: [OT] Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 Bart . Lansing (Aug 18)
- Re: [OT] Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 Joshua Levitsky (Aug 18)
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2 Jonathan Rickman (Aug 17)
- Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 Raymond (Aug 18)
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2 Brad Griffin (Aug 12)
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2 James Patterson Wicks (Aug 13)
- Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 devis (Aug 13)
- Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 13)
- Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 Barry Fitzgerald (Aug 13)
- Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 devis (Aug 13)
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2 Jonathan Rickman (Aug 13)
- Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 Dark Avenger (Aug 13)
- RE: lame bitching about xpsp2 Todd Towles (Aug 13)
- Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 devis (Aug 13)
- Re: ask apple - was: lame bitching about xpsp2 it (Aug 14)
- Re: Re: ask apple - was: lame bitching about xpsp2 kf_lists (Aug 14)
- Re: ask apple... i.t Consulting (Aug 27)
- Re: ask apple... i.t (Aug 27)
- Re: Re: ask apple - was: lame bitching about xpsp2 Chris Adams (Aug 14)
- Re: lame bitching about xpsp2 devis (Aug 13)