Full Disclosure mailing list archives
we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com
From: SMoyer () rgare com (Moyer, Shawn)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 18:47:07 -0500
Say it with me now: Proc.... Mail.... Yay! I know you could! You get a cookie! --shawn
-----Original Message----- From: martin f krafft [mailto:madduck () madduck net] Sent: Friday, 20 September, 2002 15:29 PM To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com also sprach Matthew McGehrin <mcgehrin () reverse net> [2002.09.20.1022 +0200]:I think the list should just block hushmail.com andhush.com, as in the fewdays it has been proven that these folks are usinganonymity to hide behinddozens of stupid posts. I vote to block hushmail.comI second. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck did you know that if you play a windows 2000 cd backwards, you will hear the voice of satan? that's nothing, 'cause if you play it forward, it'll install windows 2000.
Current thread:
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Matthew McGehrin (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Alif The Terrible (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Patrick Oonk (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Matthew McGehrin (Sep 20)
- gated 3.6 ripquery, was Re: we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com silvio () big net au (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Helmut Springer (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com martin f krafft (Sep 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com David Vincent (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Moyer, Shawn (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Moyer, Shawn (Sep 20)
- Re[2]: we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Mikhail Iakovlev (Sep 21)