Full Disclosure mailing list archives
we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com
From: patrick.oonk () pine nl (Patrick Oonk)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:17:00 +0200
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 04:22:40AM -0400, Matthew McGehrin wrote:
I think the list should just block hushmail.com and hush.com, as in the few days it has been proven that these folks are using anonymity to hide behind dozens of stupid posts. I vote to block hushmail.com -- Matthew
I propose you install procmail and filter the @hush* postings. Oh wait... X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 oops :) try: http://www.microsoft.com/windows98/usingwindows/communicating/articles/903Mar/OEFilter.asp Patrick -- patrick oonk - pine internet - patrick () pine nl - www.pine.nl/~patrick T:+31-70-3111010 - F:+31-70-3111011 - Read news at http://security.nl PGPid A4E74BBF fp A7CF 7611 E8C4 7B79 CA36 0BFD 2CB4 7283 A4E7 4BBF Note: my NEW PGP key is available at http://www.pine.nl/~patrick/ Excuse of the day: static from plastic slide rules
Current thread:
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Matthew McGehrin (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Alif The Terrible (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Patrick Oonk (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Matthew McGehrin (Sep 20)
- gated 3.6 ripquery, was Re: we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com silvio () big net au (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Helmut Springer (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com martin f krafft (Sep 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com David Vincent (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Moyer, Shawn (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Moyer, Shawn (Sep 20)
- Re[2]: we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Mikhail Iakovlev (Sep 21)