Full Disclosure mailing list archives
we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com
From: delta () faveve uni-stuttgart de (Helmut Springer)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:21:25 +0200
On 20 Sep 2002 at 10:22 +0200, Matthew McGehrin wrote:
I think the list should just block hushmail.com and hush.com, as in the few days it has been proven that these folks are using anonymity to hide behind dozens of stupid posts.
Which would make the easy DoS against service and list a success.
I vote to block hushmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative, try harder. -- MfG/Best regards, "A Feature you cannot disable is helmut springer considered a bug" comp.os.unix
Current thread:
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Matthew McGehrin (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Alif The Terrible (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Patrick Oonk (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Matthew McGehrin (Sep 20)
- gated 3.6 ripquery, was Re: we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com silvio () big net au (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Helmut Springer (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com martin f krafft (Sep 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com David Vincent (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Moyer, Shawn (Sep 20)
- we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Moyer, Shawn (Sep 20)
- Re[2]: we should block: hushmail.com, hush.com Mikhail Iakovlev (Sep 21)