Re: IPv6

[Dave Piscitello <dave () corecom com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 1/7/2011 6:31 PM, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
> Dave Piscitello wrote:
> > I am also not convinced that some 11th hour 59th minute "change of
> > heart" won't occur, and someone will convince the community of an
> > alternative course.
>
> Back a long time ago, in the shrouded mists of yesteryear,
> some of us asked "why not just double the address size, left-fill
> with zeroes, bump the version number, and rock on?"
>
> The answer, at that time...

That may be the answer you were offered, but the chronology of events
leading to the "selection" of IPv6 is a much darker and IMO uglier
affair. Ask John Currin (ARIN) for an eye-witness account. He's one of
the few whose eyes were not clouded or gouged out. I'll simply say that
IPNG is to IETF what the child in the streets who cried "but he has
nothing on!" was to the Emperor in Hans Christian Andersen's "the
Emperor's New Clothes".



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNLHTVAAoJEDa3DI8IpP3/PSoH/1psVmWlB1sHfgKa6StaRP30
hWabcjWq1ixPlCbz7MlqVZhS1Mg67MCd4jnYxZEZ0cerbmmuJ3D3ly9fECf2jmAs
aHtTEy2gTMnVLpWcHdvwpLP0R4/8loupZ5GrSPp31Faql1OFU44G6varfTPXTPM+
q/AfZI8u10XrGWZif6uzDBZxlUGiBRoH98Fdsc3u9oD2hKeEqsRo0hC/pEYzY38j
XceJ5g0Elt0H520vRYxp9VPWTUOAmghf9FWoftpEnqI47EywuQbgoALtM8gRs3xL
NX8qOmoFioj7GMTy4wnugX/MuMtD/w5ZQeRLrTNAmimFeRfRV2Dz5xqb8le+r3o=
=/xYr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: dave.vcf
Description:

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards