Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: OT: Av and Gartner...
From: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr () ranum com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 23:37:07 -0400
John Keeton wrote:
Also, anyone have any experiance with Garner regarding security items?
Yes. I am amazed that anyone listens to Gartner about anything. Their "research" is based almost entirely on hearsay, vendor marketing literature, and vendor briefings (aka "consulting") - while they try very hard to dodge the question of whether their "research" is influenced by the amount of money they get from a vendor, it's pretty obvious what's going on if you line up who pays them and who gets covered. You virtually never see anyone on thier stupid magic quadrant who is not a Gartner research customer or a consulting customer. Of course they're very cagy about the relationship between how much you pay and where you wind up, there have been some extraordinary anomalies. Perhaps the most significant recently was Gartner's hyping of "Intrusion Prevention" technology - in particular they widely hyped Intruvert's IPS. Yet no customers, according to a Gartner analyst I discussed Intruvert with, used Intruvert in its in-line "prevention" mode. So what did Gartner base their "research" on? Intruvert's marketing literature? There's a serious credibility gap - indeed I'd go so far as to say there's a serious integrity gap. Does Gartner test technology? No. What do they actually base their "recommendations" on? They base them on what the vendors who pay them the most - their real customers - want them to recommend. If you want recommendations that have some kind of integrity, you need to look to people who have actually gotten some hands-on time with products and who actually understand a technology. When I talk to "C-level" senior management I rate their clue level based on whether they believe Gartner reports or not. I figure if I run into a CIO who takes Gartner reports seriously, that I've run into someone who worked up the management chain through political skills and organizational skills, not through technical skills, or technological vision. Taking Gartner reports seriously is a dead-on tipoff that you're dealing with an incompetent empty suit - after all, to take Gartner seriously, you'd have to be more ignorant about technology than they are. Which is hard to imagine. mjr. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- OT: Av and Gartner... John Keeton (Jul 30)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... Paul Robertson (Jul 30)
- RE: OT: Av and Gartner... Bob Wanamaker - Avant Systems, Inc. (Jul 30)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... Jim McAtee (Jul 30)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... Paul Robertson (Jul 30)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... R. DuFresne (Jul 30)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... Luca Berra (Jul 31)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... Paul A. Henry (Jul 30)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 31)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... Fritz Ames (Jul 31)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 31)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... Dave Piscitello (Jul 31)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... Fritz Ames (Jul 31)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... Luca Berra (Jul 31)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... Gary Flynn (Jul 31)
- Re: OT: Av and Gartner... John Keeton (Jul 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: OT: Av and Gartner... Yinal Ozkan (Jul 31)
- RE: OT: Av and Gartner... Behm, Jeffrey L. (Jul 31)