Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Acqusition of time
From: Brian Ford <brford () cisco com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 19:01:58 -0500
Paul, You make a couple of good points.If a security device uses network time and can't set the clock there needs to be a capability to drop the Firewall into a blocking mode. It's the same as the capability that if the device can't write to the log it should go into blocking mode. If you must have an accurate audit capability you have to be able to put coherent time stamps on packets and be sure that they are acknowledged by the log server device.
Liberty for All, Brian At 06:04 PM 1/29/2003 -0500, firewall-wizards-request () honor icsalabs com wrote:
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:29:56 -0500 (EST) From: "Paul D. Robertson" <proberts () patriot net> To: Brian Monkman <bmonkman () comcast net> Cc: <firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com> Subject: Re: RE: [fw-wiz] Acqusition of time On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Brian Monkman wrote: > Ok - so something more specific this time. > > We are talking about a firewall farm. We want the time to be sync'ed > between all of the firewalls. Logs go to a central logging server. > Reason for the sync'ing, to ensure that time is accurate across all of > the firewalls in order to facilitate forensics and event correlation. > > In your opinion - should we have a battery backed-up clock on these > firewalls or is the network time source sufficient? If the criterion is that the firewalls be synchronized to some standard, then I suppose the real issue is what happens if a single firewall is rebooted and unable to reach either the time server or the logging server (if it's syslog, you don't even know you didn't get there?) (UDP-based syslogs were heavily affected by SQL-Slammer for instance.) Battery back-up helps for the reboot instance, and (potentially, though not normally) for the timeserver goes down instance. If there's defined behaviour for "system rebooted and couldn't reach the timeserver" and it's materially seperable from "just after midnight," then I don't suppose there's much of an issue, you can put things back together by deltaing once you do get reliable time information. Paul ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions proberts () patriot net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." probertson () trusecure com Director of Risk Assessment TruSecure Corporation
Brian Ford Consulting Engineer Corporate Consulting Engineering, Office of the Chief Technology Officer Cisco Systems, Inc. http://www.cisco.com e-mail: brford () cisco com _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- RE: Acqusition of time, (continued)
- RE: Acqusition of time Paul D. Robertson (Jan 29)
- RE: Acqusition of time dave (Jan 29)
- RE: Acqusition of time Paul D. Robertson (Jan 29)
- RE: Acqusition of time dave (Jan 29)
- RE: Acqusition of time Tina Bird (Jan 29)
- Re: Acqusition of time Volker Tanger (Jan 29)
- Re: RE: Acqusition of time Paul D. Robertson (Jan 29)
- Re: RE: Acqusition of time Joseph S D Yao (Jan 30)
- Re: Acqusition of time Volker Tanger (Jan 29)
- Re: Acqusition of time Ben Nagy (Jan 30)
- Re: Acqusition of time Martin Peikert (Jan 30)
- Re: Acqusition of time Frank Knobbe (Jan 31)
- Re: Acqusition of time Kevin Steves (Jan 31)
- Re: Acqusition of time Martin Peikert (Jan 31)