Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Firewall Throughput
From: "Darren Mackay" <darren.mackay () uq net au>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 22:06:08 +1000
Darren, | What do you value more - throughput or security ? | | If you value security, the PIX isn't the answer, | IMHO. Are you saying PIX is not secure? Are you able to elaborate? I have never had any problem with pix, and it certainly has not failed any 'ethical attacks' that haven throwed against it (unlike other vendors, which can be really esoteric in their configs to get around known vulnerabilities). ps - I personally like ipfilter, but it is extremly hard to sell it executives who sign the cheques when ther eis no official support from the vendor (ie - 24/7 by phone, etc...), thus I have to use commercial products like fw-1, pix and others. Darren Mackay _______________________________________________ Firewall-wizards mailing list Firewall-wizards () nfr net http://www.nfr.net/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Firewall Throughput Benson Hill (Sep 05)
- Re: Firewall Throughput Darren Reed (Sep 06)
- Lucent Managed Firewall Surapong Singshinsuk (Sep 07)
- Re: Lucent Managed Firewall Graham Allan (Sep 07)
- RE: Firewall Throughput Darren Mackay (Sep 12)
- Re: Firewall Throughput Darren Reed (Sep 12)
- RE: Firewall Throughput Darren Mackay (Sep 12)
- Re: Firewall Throughput Patrick Darden (Sep 12)
- Re: Firewall Throughput Darren Reed (Sep 12)
- Re: Firewall Throughput Patrick Darden (Sep 12)
- Re: Firewall Throughput Darren Reed (Sep 13)
- Vague Negative Blah Patrick Darden (Sep 14)
- Re: Firewall Throughput Ryan Russell (Sep 14)
- RE: Firewall Throughput JVBrown (Sep 13)
- Lucent Managed Firewall Surapong Singshinsuk (Sep 07)
- RE: Firewall Throughput Robert Purdy (Sep 13)
- Re: Firewall Throughput Darren Reed (Sep 06)