Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: MSN... stay away? or OK?
From: Michael.Owen () net-tel co uk
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 14:55:02 +0100
Actually, it's just a teensy weensy more involved than that. From Microsoft's recommendation at: http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/Netmeeting/Corp/ResKit/Chapter4/default .asp
Yes, but spreading such details just encourages people to try it. ;-) Though interestingly enough, you found "Pass through secondary TCP and UDP connections on dynamically assigned ports (1024-65535)." While this Microsoft article makes no mention of secondary TCP... http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q158/6/23.asp?LN=EN-US&SD=gn&FR=0 I'm not entirely sure which one is right. Possibly the secondary TCP is needed for the "Dynamic H.323 call control?" cheers, Mike ---- Michael Owen IT Security Engineer NET-TEL Computer Systems Ltd Michael.Owen () net-tel co uk _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () nfr com http://www.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- MSN... stay away? or OK? Don Harris (Oct 14)
- Re: MSN... stay away? or OK? Joseph S D Yao (Oct 16)
- RE: MSN... stay away? or OK? Michael . Owen (Oct 18)
- Message not available
- RE: MSN... stay away? or OK? Joe Matusiewicz (Oct 19)
- Message not available
- RE: MSN... stay away? or OK? ark (Oct 19)
- Message not available
- RE: MSN... stay away? or OK? Joe Matusiewicz (Oct 19)
- RE: MSN... stay away? or OK? Michael . Owen (Oct 19)
- RE: MSN... stay away? or OK? Joe Matusiewicz (Oct 19)