Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Legal question
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () research att com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:41:46 -0800
In message <7055B446C24AD2118CC000805F156594022B6A2C () aimrmsntsb irm state gov>, "Crumrine, Gary L" writes:
I think the current wiretap laws deal with the voice only environment, and have not taken into consideration the new possibilities that voice/data brings to the table. And I do not think current rules would apply.
No. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, passed in 1986, was specifically designed to address data. See, for example, http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/2511.html: Sec. 2511. Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited (1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who - (a) intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; The older wiretap law (vintage 1969) did not cover data; hence the amendments. Section 2510, part 12, defines "electronic communication" to include images, data, signals, or "intelligence of any nature". (Curiously enough, it excludes electronic funds transfer information.) --Steve Bellovin
Current thread:
- Legal question Crumrine, Gary L (Jan 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Legal question Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 16)
- RE: Legal question Carl Friedberg (Jan 16)
- Re: Legal question Gregory Stark (Jan 17)
- Re: Legal question Paul Howell (Jan 17)
- Re: Legal question Larry Fitzpatrick (Jan 17)
- RE: Legal question Staggs, Michael (Jan 18)
- Re: Legal question Larry Fitzpatrick (Jan 19)
- RE: Legal question Crumrine, Gary L (Jan 20)
- Re: Legal question Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 21)