Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Scans Observed by Officer Friendly
From: David C Niemi <niemi () tux org>
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 17:08:31 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 18 May 1999, Jonathan Care wrote:
Randy Grimshaw wrote:Where would the address 24.93.46.49 be comming from?
...
$ whois -h whois.arin.net 24.93.46.49 Time Warner Cable (NETBLK-RR-1) RR-1 24.92.0.0 - 24.95.255.255 TimeWarnerCable-RoadRunner-Gguadalupe-mcr1 (NETBLK-RR-AUS-GUA1) RR-AUS-GUA1 24.93.46.0 - 24.93.46.255
*** This is in Austin, Texas as previously noted.
Looking at these two netblocks, (NETBLK-RR-1) lists a contact address: Coordinator: Network Operations (NO35-ORG-ARIN) abuse () RR COM 1-703-345-3416
This is in Reston, Virginia, at corporate headquarters I suppose. Take your pick. It sounds like the real action was in Texas. ---- David C Niemi ----niemi at tux.org---- Reston VA USA ---- ... as FUD is our witness, we will never go hungry again. Microsoft OEM account manager, 1992.
Current thread:
- Scans Observed by Officer Friendly Randy Grimshaw (May 17)
- Re: Scans Observed by Officer Friendly Darren Reed (May 18)
- Re: Scans Observed by Officer Friendly R. DuFresne (May 18)
- RE: Scans Observed by Officer Friendly Aaron Lewter (May 21)
- RE: Scans Observed by Officer Friendly R. DuFresne (May 21)
- RE: Scans Observed by Officer Friendly Jason Ostrom (May 22)
- Re: Scans Observed by Officer Friendly R. DuFresne (May 18)
- Re: Scans Observed by Officer Friendly Darren Reed (May 18)
- Re: Scans Observed by Officer Friendly David C Niemi (May 19)
- Re: Scans Observed by Officer Friendly Randy Grimshaw (May 18)
- Responsiveness of remote admins Lance Spitzner (May 19)
- Re: Responsiveness of remote admins chuck (May 19)
- Re: Responsiveness of remote admins Lance Spitzner (May 19)
- Re: Responsiveness of remote admins Tim Kramer (May 21)
- Re: Responsiveness of remote admins Philip S Holt (May 21)
- Re: Norton AV for Firewalls mht (May 21)