Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: How stateful is stateful inspection?
From: "Sean Costello" <xlate () home com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 12:05:38 -0500
David Lang wrote: Having just gone through an evaluation of firewall-1 I would like to point out that they reccomend NOT to turn on the optional defragmentation capibility for performance/memory reasons.
I think you may be confusing the defragmentation engine with Syn Defender since there is nothing optional about the way FW1 handles these packets since at least 3.0b...if not 3.0a. Sean
Current thread:
- How stateful is stateful inspection? Lance Spitzner (Jul 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How stateful is stateful inspection? Sean Costello (Jul 13)
- Re: How stateful is stateful inspection? David Lang (Jul 14)
- Re: How stateful is stateful inspection? Sean Costello (Jul 14)
- Re: How stateful is stateful inspection? David Lang (Jul 14)