Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance
From: Lance Spitzner <lance () ksni net>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 17:18:52 -0600 (CST)
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Saravana Ram wrote:
I would like to get the wizards' take on what people are doing with respect to staying connected and functional on the Internet during the rollover to the year 2000. Do most organizations seem to be leaning towards reduced exposure (i.e. shutting down incoming SMTP, restricting download cpability, etc.), total blackout, or business as usual.If one is doubt of the Y2k compliance of their webservers, mailservers, routers, and firewalls, he/she should have done their homework by now.
To be honest, I don't think webservers, mailservers, routers, and firewalls are going to be the problem. The problem may be when everyone comes into work monday morning, turns on their PC, and discovers they have been hit by the "Trojan du-jour". That, and all the script kiddies who will be out in force that night. Lance Spitzner http://www.enteract.com/~lspitz/papers.html
Current thread:
- Y2K rollover Vigilance Brad MacQuarrie (Dec 06)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Saravana Ram (Dec 07)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Lance Spitzner (Dec 07)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Alejandro Rusell (Dec 07)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Saravana Ram (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Don Helms (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Daniel Monjar (Dec 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Zzzil (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Brad MacQuarrie (Dec 08)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Paul Grabow (Dec 30)
- Re: Y2K rollover Vigilance Saravana Ram (Dec 07)