Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Apology - not necessary
From: John Nicholson <jnichols () prg com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 17:44:42 -0400
At 03:04 PM 9/27/1998 -0400, you wrote:
The rest of your message, which seems to be "we can't trust Israelis
and have to assume FW1 is filled with back doors", is about as low on the scale as I can imagine a professional in our world sinking. You should be ashamed of yourself.<< Before this turns into a flame war, I think you may have taken what was written a little too far. No one said, "We can't trust Israelis" and no one said FW-1 is full of back doors. What was said was, if I may paraphrase, that if a country might use it's intelligence agency against the US or US companies, then that country might put pressure on a software firm developing protective software to give the intelligence service the "keys" to getting in the back door. Therefore, this creates a risk in using that software. Maybe not a large risk, but this is a reasonable concern for certain companies and facilities. You seem to have no problems about the same implication for French software. Would you have the same objection if someone had written, "A reasonably paranoid sysadmin should consider avoiding Russian (or Soviet) firewall technology"? I notice that you did not comment on the assertion that the Israelis had been caught with their hand in the cookie jar. If that is true, then why should a reasonably paranoid person NOT think twice about using software that could have been influenced by that gov't? My company does not deal in gov't or defense secrets, we build scenery for Broadway. Therefore, I don't worry about the risk of some foreign power sneeking in my back door. But if I were in the military or dealing with defense technology, I'd constantly be looking over my shoulder. John ======================================================================= "We have not succeeded in solving all your problems. The answers we have found only serve to raise a whole set of new questions. In some ways we feel we are as confused as ever, but we believe we are confused on a higher level and about more important things." -Anonymous Consultant
Current thread:
- Apology Jason L. Snowden (Sep 24)
- Re: Apology - not necessary Frank Willoughby (Sep 25)
- Re: Apology - not necessary Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 25)
- Re: Apology - not necessary Paul D. Robertson (Sep 26)
- Re: Apology - not necessary Paul D. Robertson (Sep 29)
- Re: Apology - not necessary Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 25)
- Re: Apology - not necessary Perry E. Metzger (Sep 29)
- Re: Apology - not necessary John Nicholson (Sep 29)
- Re: Apology - not necessary Perry E. Metzger (Sep 29)
- Re: Apology - not necessary Frank Willoughby (Sep 25)