Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
FW: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice
From: "SCHALIP, MICHAEL" <mschalip () CNM EDU>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 07:42:01 -0700
Hey Educause.....any thoughts here? We come on this discussion group for the free exchange of ideas - and THIS is allowed!? Wow..... From: Dennis Meharchand [mailto:dennis () valtx com] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:25 PM To: SCHALIP, MICHAEL Subject: RE: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice Michael, I think your response was bad form. I am instructing my lawyers to file the first patent infringement lawsuit against CNM. Let's see how much of a bad publicity stunt this is. Dennis Meharchand CEO, Valt.X Technologies Inc. Cell: 416-618-4622 Email: dennis () valtx com<mailto:dennis () valtx com> Web: www.valtx.com<http://www.valtx.com> From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of SCHALIP, MICHAEL Sent: December 7, 2011 9:34 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: [Possible Spam] Re: [SECURITY] Deepfreeze on vm's? Bad form.....scare tactics.....bad publicity stunt.....how do we get the Educause moderator involved?? From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU] On Behalf Of Walter Moore Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 6:54 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Deepfreeze on vm's? You had it right in your first paragraph. Whatever the merits of your patent case (and you will have to forgive my skepticism) you have no business interjecting it into this discussion. On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Dennis Meharchand <dennis () valtx com<mailto:dennis () valtx com>> wrote: This is likely one of those situations where I should just continue to shut my mouth until we are already to act but here goes: My company Valt.X Technologies owns the patents in this area and we intend to enforce our patents in 2012. Here's my advice - if you are using Deep Freeze or any VDI - include in your contract that they cover you for Patent Infringement. Valt.X has just won its first public tender in Canada - we own this area and intend to enforce our intellectual property rights. Our position is that Deep Freeze is a blatant copy of Valt.X issued patents and that VDI also infringes our patents - we intend to sue all infringers. Dennis Meharchand CEO, Valt.X Technologies Inc. Cell: 416-618-4622<tel:416-618-4622> Email: dennis () valtx com<mailto:dennis () valtx com> Web: www.valtx.com<http://www.valtx.com> From: The EDUCAUSE Security Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU<mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU>] On Behalf Of Brandon Payne Sent: December 6, 2011 6:01 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU<mailto:SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU> Subject: [SECURITY] Deepfreeze on vm's? We are looking into VDI for all our computer labs. VMware View to be exact with WYSE P20 Zero Clients. Roughly about 300 or more vm's for all the labs.
From a virtual standpoint - do you see the need for Faronics Deepfreeze on all computer lab vm's? Currently we are using Deepfreeze on our desktops in all labs and has worked out great. For this situation, I'm not interested in the security implications of why Deepfreeze is bad, just if its recommended in a virtual environment.
What are you doing in situations if a user profile gets hosed up with malware in this vm enviroment? -- Brandon Payne Technical Support Specialist Information Services Sauk Valley Community College -- +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ Walter R. Moore -- Sr. Systems Administrator, Eckerd College moorewr () eckerd edu<mailto:moorewr () eckerd edu> -- http://home.eckerd.edu/~moorewr "It was glorious to see -- if your heart were iron, And you could keep from grieving at all the pain" - The Iliad (13.355) I'm on twitter: http://twitter.com/moorewreckerd ***Reminder! ITS will never ask you to e-mail your password!*** -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Current thread:
- Re: Deepfreeze on vm's?, (continued)
- Re: Deepfreeze on vm's? Dennis Meharchand (Dec 07)
- Re: Deepfreeze on vm's? Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Dec 07)
- Re: Deepfreeze on vm's? Dennis Meharchand (Dec 07)
- Re: Deepfreeze on vm's? Mclaughlin, Kevin (mclaugkl) (Dec 07)
- OT: Software patent FUD? Steve Bohrer (Dec 07)
- Re: OT: Software patent FUD? Jay Fowler (Dec 07)
- Re: OT: Software patent FUD? R. J. Cronk (Dec 07)
- Re: OT: Software patent FUD? Dave Koontz (Dec 07)
- Re: OT: Software patent FUD? Tracy Mitrano (Dec 07)
- Re: Deepfreeze on vm's? Valdis Kletnieks (Dec 07)
- Message not available
- FW: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice SCHALIP, MICHAEL (Dec 08)
- Re: FW: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice Hanson, Mike (Dec 08)
- Re: FW: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice Drew Perry (Dec 08)
- Re: FW: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice Semmens, Theresa (Dec 08)
- Re: FW: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice Sarazen, Daniel (Dec 08)
- Re: FW: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice Ken Connelly (Dec 08)
- Re: FW: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice Chuck Dunn (Dec 08)
- Re: FW: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice Carson, Larry (Dec 08)
- Re: FW: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice Valerie Vogel (Dec 08)
- Re: FW: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice Ian McDonald (Dec 08)
- Re: FW: Michael - Patent Infringement Notice Bateman, Darrell (Dec 08)